|
CASTRO'S HEIR? Reprinted by popular demand.
originally posted: September 24, 2007
A friend of mine sent me an e-mail on the condition I not tell anyone. No one has heard from him now in almost two months, and I’m constrained to break my pledge of silence in the hope that someone may have seen him alive. A recent picture is attached. Here's what my friend wrote:
“The corked bottle of Cuban rum that floated onto the Gulf Stream shore was empty. I had to break the bottle to retrieve the short letter from Fidel Castro that was inside. Roughly translated it reads as follows:
To the person who finds the bottle in which I place this letter I bequeath all my worldly goods and the power to succeed me as President of the Cuban State. To redeem this grant all you need to do is spend 30 days in Miami before coming to Havana to be given my blank check and sworn into office by my brother, Raul. Good luck, my prayers are with you.
Fidel.
"According to the pundits, Fidel Castro is immensely rich, so I’ve been giving this a lot of thought. The part that bothers me is the 30 days in Miami. Why did he insist on that? Is it a test of some kind? Frankly, I don’t think I’d last a day there as Castro’s heir apparent, let alone a month. If I were to get all his worldly goods in cash I might be able to buy my way out of problems in Coral Gables, but if he’s not dead yet I guess there’s not much chance of that.
“I’m not sure I want the job anyway. I’d have to spend a lot of time keeping that clown Chavez happy, while balancing my affections for the Cubans in Havana with the ones who now live in the States. As great people as they are I’d rather meet regularly with the Mountain natives of Borneo. I mean that’s a job for insomniacs and masochists.
“The rum’s not bad, but I prefer the Jamaican variety. Having an unlimited supply of Cuban cigars was worth momentary consideration, until I remembered it hurt when the smoke got in my eyes.
“I’d get to give speeches to the United Nations and in Revolutionary Square about how awful Americans from the U.S. are. But that’s old hat at this point, and others do it better. My Spanish would need some major overhaul.
“The best part would be the beaches. I know they’re better than this beach where I found the bottle. Imagine what I could do with thousands of miles of unspoiled shorelines and estuaries. It brings tears to my eyes.
“If power corrupts, then the temptation to become powerful is overwhelming. So I guess I’ll take it to the next level and book a flight to Miami. It’s an exciting town now and full of beautiful people that will no doubt surround me with excesses. I’ll try it for a few days, and if it gets too much I can always return home no worse for the experience.
“Do you think I need to tell Fidel or Raul that I’m coming?”
Send author a comment on this post
CONFESSIONS OF A CUBAN COUNTER REVOLUTIONARY
originally posted: June 17, 2007
Sometimes the truth is hard to come by. In Cuba a couple of years ago in the company of a group of North American lawyers, I came across a 19 year old MAN who was complaining about the U.S. embargo against Americans doing business with Cubans in Cuba. I sympathized, but pointed to Fidel Castro’s repressive regime for the embargo’s rationale.
“You’re a lawyer,” he said, “and you tell me that?”
As I nodded a “yes,” I could see him getting up the nerve to make his point.
“Would you like to know why we Cubans haven’t overthrown Fidel Castro? Certainly you lawyers have heard of the Helms-Burton Act? This law, passed by your Congress in 1996, says your President and State Department cannot help Cuba form a new government until the claims against my country by those Cubans who fled to Miami are satisfied. Why should I risk my life to line the pockets of those people, who would then return and take Fidel’s place in Havana?”
Back in Washington I made good on a promise to check out Helms-Burton, and in the process turned up this bit of legislative history. Senator Chris Dodd, speaking on the Senate floor in 1995 during the debate on passage of the Helms-Burton Act, argued,
“…the language, Mr. President, is pretty emphatic – No assistance may be provided . . . to a transition government in Cuba. We now have 38 countries in the world, including Cuba, where United States citizens’ property has been expropriated, and we are in the process of trying to get those individuals compensated for that property. Some of these countries are very strong allies of ours. We never said before we cannot provide any assistance to those countries until those claims and matters are settled, and yet that is what we do with this legislation. . . I just think it’s bad policy, Mr. President [to] absolutely hamstring not just this administration, but future administrations, from being able to move intelligently and rapidly to try to shore up a government that will follow Fidel Castro.”
The Honorable Messrs. Helms and Burton are long gone from office, but the Castro’s are as painfully present as ever. Meanwhile this law, and the Trade Embargo on Americans doing business in Cuba which it was designed to tighten and expand, have not only failed in their purpose to depose Castro, they have helped keep him in power.
Does anyone doubt that having American engineers, entrepreneurs, teachers, builders, technicians, and farmers on the ground in Cuba would help provide the templates and incentives for a free society to evolve in Cuba as American businessmen have provided elsewhere around the globe? Of course Castro can try to prevent this from evolving, but those behind the Iron Curtain failed in their attempts to do the same. Anyway, why should we do Castro’s work for him?
Let’s give all of us Americans the freedom to make happen in Havana what those Cubans who came to Florida have had the freedom to accomplish in Miami.
Send author a comment on this post
|